C. Langmo
To Win
A. Rai
To Win
Christian Langmo vs John Valenti Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L L W
Form
W L L L L L L L L WHead-2-Head: Langmo 1 - 0 Valenti
They have played 2 sets in total, with Langmo winning 2 and Valenti winning 0. The last match between Langmo and Valenti was at the USA F3, 21-01-2013, Pre-Q round, Clay with Christian Langmo getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Christian Langmo | 1 |
| John Valenti | 0 |
USA F3(21-01-2013)
6
1
6
2
| Langmo | Stats | Valenti |
|---|---|---|
| 69% (22-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 319 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 318 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 28 | Age | 48 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (249-179) | Career Total W/L | 13% (5-33) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Keys VS Vekic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Christian Langmo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Christian Langmo
Player
Yaojie Zeng
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
10
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Christian Langmo
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johannus Monday
Player
Christian Langmo
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Dong Geon Kim
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Christian Langmo
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
50
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Ajeet Rai
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
8
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Pavle Marinkov
72%
(
83 of
116)
1st Serve %
53%
(
61 of
115)
23
Aces
17
3
Double Faults
9
78%
(
65 of
83)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
54 of
61)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
29 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
32 of
115)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(4) 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Christian Langmo
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
John Valenti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Q | 5-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (249/179) | Win/Loss | 13% (5/33) |
| 56% (556/430) | Sets Win/Loss | 13% (10/66) |
| 52% (4987/4628) | Games Win/Loss | 29% (169/415) |
| 60% (201/134) | Hard Win/Loss | 7% (1/14) |
| 51% (41/39) | Clay Win/Loss | 18% (4/18) |
| 33% (2/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 71% (5/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.58 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 2739 | Aces Total | 1 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.01 |
| 1175 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:32:19 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 453.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 351.29 |
| 63% (16123/25694) | 1st Serve % | 58% (48/83) |
| 74% (11898/16123) | 1st Serve Win % | 35% (17/48) |
| 50% (4801/9571) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (13/35) |
| 38% (862/2253) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 37% (9587/26169) | Return Points Win % | 18% (12/65) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (66/68) | Challenger W/L | 7% (1/14) |
| 62% (183/111) | Futures W/L | 20% (4/16) |
| 59% (246/420) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 11% (4/37) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (82/146) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 56% (76/135) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 86% (235/202) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (6/5) |
| 14% (235/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (6/1) |
| 24% (192/47) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (32/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
